by ANN GIVENS
The absence of a working sprinkler system in the former Deutsche Bank building was not an accident, city and state officials said yesterday. Shutting it off was a deliberate decision made by regulators well before workers started taking apart the toxic, flammable building.
Explanations differ as to why and exactly when the building's sprinklers were shut off. A fire department official said they broke during the 2001 terrorist attacks and were never repaired, while a spokesman for the Lower Manhattan Development Corp., the building's owner, said regulators shut the sprinklers off after 9/11 because pumps driving the water were contaminated.
But one thing is certain: While maintaining a working sprinkler system is standard in most dangerous deconstruction projects, it was never required by regulators at 130 Liberty St.
"If the sprinklers were in there and functioning, we wouldn't be talking right now, because the fire would have been extinguished and no one would have died," said Glenn Corbett, a fire science professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
The deadly fire at the former Deutsche Bank building started Aug. 18, probably after a worker failed to stamp out a cigarette on the 17th floor, city officials said this week. Firefighters faced a host of obstacles in addition to the absence of a sprinkler system, including blocked stairwells, piles of flammable materials and a broken central water pipe.
Joseph Graffagnino, 33, of Brooklyn, and Robert Beddia, 53, of Staten Island were both killed fighting the fire.
Gregory Harrington, principal fire protection engineer at the National Fire Prevention Association, a Quincy, Mass., nonprofit group that has written fire safety codes for numerous cities and states, said the association's codes require that sprinkler systems remain on each floor of a building until that floor is ready to be demolished. It is unclear whether the city building and fire departments, which set sprinkler requirements, use those codes.
A building department spokeswoman declined comment, saying it is part of the ongoing investigation by Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau and state Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.
A fire department spokesman, Jim Long, said the sprinkler system broke on Sept. 11, 2001, and a decision was made not to replace it since the building was being torn down. Asked whether a sprinkler system was important, Long answered that it is not as important as the central water pipe or standpipe.
Corbett said leaving the sprinklers in would have made asbestos removal in the building more difficult. But he and Harrington agreed it is both possible and common for workers to shut off sprinkler systems one floor at a time.
"Removing the sprinkler system is sort of like taking the brakes out of your car. It means you have to be that much more careful that nothing else will go wrong," Corbett said.
 |
